<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000099">
On 25/03/2016 16:31, Jeffrey Walton wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAH8yC8kiiP-GLTDj0v8wSDrufzL+QxbNButTnKrcVPswuQteUg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Here's the rollup patch that makes -ansi work. Most of it was "inline"
-> "ossl_inline".
Some hoops were jumped through to get SSIZE_MAX defined correctly.
Drepper signed-off on roughly the same fix about 15 years ago for
glibc; see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2002-08/msg00031.html">http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2002-08/msg00031.html</a>.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Calibri">Just out of interest, what requirement is there
to be able to build with compilers which support only a 27 year
old version of C which was superseded 17 years ago? I can't
imagine much need to build now with compilers which don't support
at least the most popular features of C99 like inline.<br>
<br>
After recent pruning OpenSSL still supports an impressive range of
platforms and compilers; are any of them known to support nothing
newer than C89?</font><br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
J. J. Farrell
Not speaking for Oracle.
</pre>
</body>
</html>