<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">It doesn’t stop us both reviewing a PR. That doesn’t mean we both need to approve.</div><div class=""><br class=""><div class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br class=""></div></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 24 May 2019, at 7:21 pm, Matthias St. Pierre <<a href="mailto:Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com" class="">Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""><br class="">>       <p>In considering approvals, the combined approvals must come<br class="">>       from individuals who work for separate organisations.<br class="">>       This condition does not apply where the organisation is the<br class="">>       OSF or OSS.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">IMHO an important clarification needs to be made: The rule should not be about<br class="">_prohibiting_ double approvals. It should only be about _counting_ them.<br class="">I would not deprive people of the right to state their opinions.<br class=""><br class="">Also, if Shane has already approved, then Pauli should still have the right<br class="">to approve, since his approval counts as OMC approval and Shane's not.<br class=""><br class="">How about using a formulation like the following?<br class=""><br class="">        <p>In considering approvals, approvals from individuals being<br class="">        employed by the same third party company or organization should<br class="">        be counted as a single approval. If one of the individuals is<br class="">        an OMC member, the combined approval counts as an OMC approval.<br class="">        This condition does not apply where the organisation is the<br class="">        OSF or OSS.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">An editorial comment: I think that the amendmend should be made inside the<br class="">unordered list, not following it.<br class=""><br class=""><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_web_blob_master_policies_committers.html-23L72-2DL78&d=DwIDaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b1aL1L-m41VGkedIk-9Q7taAEKIshTBwq95Iah07uCk&m=DYHGYucybgbeMHQn9pS8SBhh_dvJkYrDgKu9gU2l9H4&s=jT3VTidhpkkMAwUuiu_JgqW9mBpD4PP-3Qc8D3KZDdU&e=" class="">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_web_blob_master_policies_committers.html-23L72-2DL78&d=DwIDaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=b1aL1L-m41VGkedIk-9Q7taAEKIshTBwq95Iah07uCk&m=DYHGYucybgbeMHQn9pS8SBhh_dvJkYrDgKu9gU2l9H4&s=jT3VTidhpkkMAwUuiu_JgqW9mBpD4PP-3Qc8D3KZDdU&e=</a><br class=""><br class="">Apart from that: Tim, could you (or someone else of the OMC) please raise a PR<br class="">for your proposal? That would make it easier to discuss the details.<br class=""><br class="">Matthias<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>