[openssl-users] Checking for AES-NI accelration
Jan Just Keijser
janjust at nikhef.nl
Wed Aug 10 13:28:01 UTC 2016
Hi,
On 10/08/16 14:25, Nagesh shamnur wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I am running an application which transfers huge chunks of data every
> second (850Mbps) and the same is secured using openssl. However the
> CPU usage on windows is very high ( ~ 100%). So as a part of the
> analysis, I stumbled upon the information that, when using AES
> encryption, if the underlying hardware is Intel CPU, it can support
> AES-NI instruction set and hence make the crypto processing faster.
> So, I wanted to confirm if the same is enabled in my hardware.
>
> So, I wanted to know how to verify if the run is able to use the
> AES-NI instruction set available in the hardware.
>
> I have built openssl and have ensured enabling the asm in both linux
> and windows build.
>
> For windows, to confirm if AES-NI is enabled, support of tools
> available like truecrypt, CPU-Z and blackbox were used if the same was
> enabled in OS usage. And I found that the same is disabled. Also I
> found in some blogs that the same needs to be enabled in BIOS. When
> checked the BIOS settings, the option was not be found and a BIOS
> update is required to enable the same.
>
> However in linux I was unable to conclude if AES-NI is disabled since
> I didn’t had access to any such tools on linux. I checked "#cpuinfo |
> grep aes" and i was unable to find any line regarding AES-NI. However
> when i run the ./openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm and
> OPENSSL_ia32cap="~0x200000200000000" ./openssl speed -elapsed -evp
> aes-128-gcm i am able to find the difference in speed. So i wanted to
> check how to confirm if my linux build has AES-NI enabled or not?
>
> Environment Information:
>
> CPU: E5-2620 0 @2.0GHz
>
> OS: Windows Server 2008
>
> Linux: Ubuntu 3.11.0-15-generic
>
> Openssl versoin: 1.0.2h
>
>
I've got a server with that exact same CPU over here; with openssl
1.0.2d I see the following results:
$ ./openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm
[...]
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-gcm 184391.41k 465791.06k 689190.61k .65k 781295.62k
$ OPENSSL_ia32cap=0 ./openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm
[...]
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-gcm 43906.03k 49490.24k 51037.70k 51554.65k 51699.71k
i.e. with AES-NI disabled performance is about ~15 times less. On this
CPU turboboost is not working so your numbers maybe slightly different.
Another good way to test whether AES-NI is working is by comparing
BF-CBC to AES-256-CBC: without AES-NI, BF will be faster. with AES-NI,
AES will be faster.
HTH,
JJK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160810/c21a3e9f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list