[openssl-users] [EXT] TLS 1.3 performance

[Neetish Pathak]

Thanks Roelof,

This is really helpful.

BR,
Neetish

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Roelof Du Toit <Roelof_Dutoit at symantec.com>
wrote:

> Hi Neetish,
>
>
>
> I would recommend considering the following in your research:
>
> - The impact of Nagle.  See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/4237
>
> - The impact of the KeyShare calculation on TLS 1.3 session resumption
> (assuming most deployments will use psk_dhe_ke)
>
> - The impact of post-handshake handshake messages.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Roelof
>
>
>
> *From: *openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org> on behalf of
> Neetish Pathak <npathak2 at ncsu.edu>
> *Reply-To: *"openssl-users at openssl.org" <openssl-users at openssl.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 4:20 PM
> *To: *"openssl-users at openssl.org" <openssl-users at openssl.org>
> *Subject: *[EXT] [openssl-users] TLS 1.3 performance
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I worked on TLS 1.3 performance bench-marking. After my tests, I found
> that TLS 1.3 based resumption is not giving us the connection latency
> benefits when tested in a LAN environment. It is slower than TLS 1.2. When
> tested on WAN, definitely, TLS 1.3 fares better than TLS 1.2.
>
> I want your suggestion on whether can I work on the following problem for
> my research project: *"Investigating why TLS 1.3
> resumption/0-RTT/full-handshake doesn't provide the  desired connection
> latency benefits in LAN and the ways to make it faster?"*
>
> I want suggestions/references on the right research problem. Any ideas
> will be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Neetish
>
> --
> openssl-users mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20170916/4670bd44/attachment-0001.html>