[openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

[Norm Green]

Just download and build v1.1.1 pre alpha 1 on Solaris.  It's on 
ftp.openssl.org.  That's all I did.  Configure using 
solaris64-sparcv9-cc .  I'm using Solaris studio 12.3.

Norm


On 2/20/2018 10:01 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 20/02/18 12:47 PM, Norm Green wrote:
>> On 2/20/2018 5:43 AM, Michael Wojcik wrote:
>>> Not by default. The comments in /usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h (on 
>>> a Solaris system) explain this in excruciating detail, but in short 
>>> you need either -DPOSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L or -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 (or 
>>> the equivalent in the code) to compile with XPG6 (aka IEEE 
>>> 1003.1-2001).
>> Thanks for the suggestions Michael.  Neither resolves the problem. In 
>> fact, adding -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 causes a new problem:
>>
>> /opt/solarisstudio12.3/bin/c99  -I. -Icrypto/include -Iinclude -m64 
>> -xtarget=ultra2 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -xstrconst -Xa -DB_ENDIAN 
>> -DBN_DIV2W -KPIC -xildoff -mt -xcode=pic32 -g -DDSO_DLFCN 
>> -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_STATIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC 
>> -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m 
>> -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM 
>> -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DFILIO_H -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W 
>> -D_REENTRANT 
>> -DOPENSSLDIR="\"/hamburg4/users/normg/gs64trunk/slow10/openssl_1.1/install10/ssl\"" 
>> -DENGINESDIR="\"/hamburg4/users/normg/gs64trunk/slow10/openssl_1.1/install10/lib/engines-1.1\"" 
>> -c -o crypto/bio/b_addr.o crypto/bio/b_addr.c
>> "crypto/bio/b_addr.c", line 198: undefined symbol: NI_MAXHOST
>> "crypto/bio/b_addr.c", line 198: variable length array can not be 
>> initialized: host
>> "crypto/bio/b_addr.c", line 198: undefined symbol: NI_MAXSERV
>> "crypto/bio/b_addr.c", line 198: variable length array can not be 
>> initialized: serv
>> c99: acomp failed for crypto/bio/b_addr.c
>> Makefile:881: recipe for target 'crypto/bio/b_addr.o' failed
>>
>>
>> I also tried building with c99 instead of cc, without success.
>>
>
>
> Is there a handy source tarball somewhere so that I may also have a
> look at this?  I have had good success in the past with both c99 and
> with fairly restrictive CFLAGS so I would like to look into this
> also.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>