[openssl-users] PKCS7 signature process

Patrice Guérin guerinp at talasi.fr
Wed May 16 15:19:33 UTC 2018


Hello OpenSSL-users

In the purpose of signing pdf files, I've found a difference of 
behaviour that I can't explain between two ways of computing signatures.
The first one leads to an error in the way that Adobe says that the file 
was modified after signing, the second does not.

First Method:
     BIO* BioMem = BIO_new( BIO_s_mem() );
     while ( Data )
BIO_write( BioMem , Data, DataLen );
     MyPKCS7 = PKCS7_sign( Certificate, PrivateKey,NULL, BioMem , 
PKCS7_DETACHED | PKCS7_BINARY );
     PKCS7_final( MyPKCS7, BioMem , PKCS7_DETACHED | PKCS7_BINARY );
     BIO* BioOut = BIO_new( BIO_s_mem() );
     i2d_PKCS7_bio( BioOut , MyPKCS7 );
     char*    OutBuf = NULL;
     int OutLen = BIO_get_mem_data( BioOut , &OutBuf );

Second Method:
     BIO* BioMem = BIO_new( BIO_s_mem() );
     MyPKCS7 = PKCS7_sign( Certificate, PrivateKey,NULL, BioMem , 
PKCS7_DETACHED | PKCS7_BINARY );
     while ( Data )
         BIO_write( BioMem , Data, DataLen );
     PKCS7_final( MyPKCS7, BioMem , PKCS7_DETACHED | PKCS7_BINARY );
     BIO* BioOut = BIO_new( BIO_s_mem() );
     i2d_PKCS7_bio( BioOut , MyPKCS7 );
     char*    OutBuf = NULL;
     int OutLen = BIO_get_mem_data( BioOut , &OutBuf );

It seems that the order between PKCS7_sign et BIO_Write that feeds the 
memory BIO has an importance.

Can anybody explains why the first method is incorrect ?

Thank you in advance
Patrice.


More information about the openssl-users mailing list