Will my application be FIPS 140-2 Certified under following conditions?

[Dr Paul Dale]

I think it’s worth pointing out that OpenSSL is itself a non-profit and that FIPS validations cost a significant amount of money.

Until about a year ago, there was also a notable absence of FIPS sponsors.


Pauli
-- 
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption 
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia



> On 8 Jul 2019, at 7:18 pm, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users <openssl-users at openssl.org> wrote:
> 
> On 08/07/2019 10:12, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
>> I have to disagree with the “decision not to make a FIPS module for the current 1.1.x series” comment.  Technically, this is true.  More practically, 3.0 is intended to be source compatible with 1.1.x.  Thus far, nothing should be broken in this respect.
>> 
> The key word is "intended".
> 
>> If support for 1.0.2 is required beyond the end of this year, it is available: https://www.openssl.org/support/contracts.html
>> 
> I am unsure if this is an affordable route for all affected users
> and distributions (especially non-profit OS distributions).
> 
>> 
>> I’d also be interested to know what is wrong with the policy page?
>> 
> 
> Only that it states the policy of stopping 1.0.2 support at end of
> 2019, which would be fine if a FIPS-capable replacement had been
> ready by now (as is fortunately the case for non-FIPS).
> 
> Enjoy
> 
> Jakob
> -- 
> Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
> Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
> This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
> WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20190708/1d1cc751/attachment.html>