Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

[ramakrushna mishra]

Hi All,

Thanks for all your response.
I have tried to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the lib path of newly installed
openssl and still "./openssl version" fails with the same reason.

There is another suggestion to "compile with a RUNPATH set in the
output ELF files.  " . Could anyone please provide more details about this
and how to do it ?

Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 6:20 AM <openssl-users-request at openssl.org> wrote:

> Send openssl-users mailing list submissions to
>         openssl-users at openssl.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         openssl-users-request at openssl.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         openssl-users-owner at openssl.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of openssl-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b (Jakob Bohm)
>    5. Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b (Dennis Clarke)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:19:53 +0100
> From: Jakob Bohm <jb-openssl at wisemo.com>
> To: openssl-users at openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b
> Message-ID: <649ef06e-0f64-65bb-cb43-cfde681fd117 at wisemo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> >> My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries.
> >> To find out whether this is the case, try
> >>
> >>  ??? ldd bin/openssl
> >>
> >> If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >> explicitely.
> > Actually LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil.
> >
> > The correct way to do this is to compile with a RUNPATH set in the
> > output ELF files.
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH overriding the compiled in RUNPATH is appropriate when
> testing
> a newly compiled binary before installing the libraries to their final
> locations, perhaps
> on the same, perhaps on another machine.
>
> P.S.
> I don't known if the Solaris loader lets LD_LIBRARY_PATH override
> RUNPATH as
> presumed by the above answer.
>
> Enjoy
>
> Jakob
> --
> Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
> Transformervej 29, 2860 S?borg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
> This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
> WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:49:30 -0400
> From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave.org>
> To: openssl-users at openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b
> Message-ID: <4b08232c-f734-987c-814c-5acef59f42ab at blastwave.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On 3/15/19 1:19 PM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:
> > On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> >>> My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries.
> >>> To find out whether this is the case, try
> >>>
> >>> ???? ldd bin/openssl
> >>>
> >>> If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >>> explicitely.
> >> Actually LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil.
> >>
> >> The correct way to do this is to compile with a RUNPATH set in the
> >> output ELF files.
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH overriding the compiled in RUNPATH is appropriate when
> > testing
> > a newly compiled binary before installing the libraries to their final
> > locations, perhaps
> > on the same, perhaps on another machine.
> >
> > P.S.
> > I don't known if the Solaris loader lets LD_LIBRARY_PATH override
> > RUNPATH as
> > presumed by the above answer.
>
> Yes it certainly does. Otherwise testing a new custom lib would be a
> royal pain as opposed to just a pain.  Also most people still, after
> twenty years, know what LD_LIBRARY_PATH env var is for and it is a waste
> of breath trying to explain it after decades of watching folks skewer
> themselves over and over and over ....
>
> dc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-users mailing list
> openssl-users at openssl.org
> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of openssl-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 19
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20190319/826d3d95/attachment.html>