Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b

[ramakrushna mishra]

>
> Hi All,
>

Thanks for your responses.
I am able to build openssl 1.1.1 on my solaris and able to run "openssl
version".
I followed the same procedure for openssl 1.1.1b and when I run "openssl
version"  seeing the mentioned error. i.e
"ld.so.1: openssl: fatal: relocation error: file openssl: symbol
OPENSSL_sk_new_null: referenced symbol not found
Killed
".

So, How come it works with openssl 1.1.1 and not with 1.1.1b.
I am using the same machine and same procedure to configure and install it.
So, Is there anything different that need to be done for 1.1.1b version ?

Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna


>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 6:20 AM <openssl-users-request at openssl.org> wrote:
>
>> Send openssl-users mailing list submissions to
>>         openssl-users at openssl.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         openssl-users-request at openssl.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         openssl-users-owner at openssl.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of openssl-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b (Jakob Bohm)
>>    5. Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b (Dennis Clarke)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:19:53 +0100
>> From: Jakob Bohm <jb-openssl at wisemo.com>
>> To: openssl-users at openssl.org
>> Subject: Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b
>> Message-ID: <649ef06e-0f64-65bb-cb43-cfde681fd117 at wisemo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>
>> On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> > On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>> >> My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries.
>> >> To find out whether this is the case, try
>> >>
>> >>  ??? ldd bin/openssl
>> >>
>> >> If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> >> explicitely.
>> > Actually LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil.
>> >
>> > The correct way to do this is to compile with a RUNPATH set in the
>> > output ELF files.
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH overriding the compiled in RUNPATH is appropriate when
>> testing
>> a newly compiled binary before installing the libraries to their final
>> locations, perhaps
>> on the same, perhaps on another machine.
>>
>> P.S.
>> I don't known if the Solaris loader lets LD_LIBRARY_PATH override
>> RUNPATH as
>> presumed by the above answer.
>>
>> Enjoy
>>
>> Jakob
>> --
>> Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
>> Transformervej 29, 2860 S?borg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
>> This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
>> WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:49:30 -0400
>> From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave.org>
>> To: openssl-users at openssl.org
>> Subject: Re: Reg solaris support for openssl 1.1.1b
>> Message-ID: <4b08232c-f734-987c-814c-5acef59f42ab at blastwave.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>>
>> On 3/15/19 1:19 PM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:
>> > On 15/03/2019 14:33, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> >> On 3/15/19 5:38 AM, Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>> >>> My guess is that your binary is loading the system's shared libraries.
>> >>> To find out whether this is the case, try
>> >>>
>> >>> ???? ldd bin/openssl
>> >>>
>> >>> If my assumption is correct, you might have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> >>> explicitely.
>> >> Actually LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil.
>> >>
>> >> The correct way to do this is to compile with a RUNPATH set in the
>> >> output ELF files.
>> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH overriding the compiled in RUNPATH is appropriate when
>> > testing
>> > a newly compiled binary before installing the libraries to their final
>> > locations, perhaps
>> > on the same, perhaps on another machine.
>> >
>> > P.S.
>> > I don't known if the Solaris loader lets LD_LIBRARY_PATH override
>> > RUNPATH as
>> > presumed by the above answer.
>>
>> Yes it certainly does. Otherwise testing a new custom lib would be a
>> royal pain as opposed to just a pain.  Also most people still, after
>> twenty years, know what LD_LIBRARY_PATH env var is for and it is a waste
>> of breath trying to explain it after decades of watching folks skewer
>> themselves over and over and over ....
>>
>> dc
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openssl-users mailing list
>> openssl-users at openssl.org
>> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of openssl-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 19
>> *********************************************
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20190326/09253e6e/attachment.html>