Additional FOM 3.0 question

[Pete]

Excellent.  That's exactly what I was looking for.  Sorry for missing
that down at the bottom.

Thanks again,
Pete

On 4/8/20 12:34 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2020 17:11, Pete wrote:
>> By any chance has there been any discussion yet regarding what will and
>> will not be in the new 3.0 FOM?  If I recall correctly, the content list
>> for the now defunct 1.1.1 based FOM was very long and complete.  Our
>> team is in the planning stages for migrating to 3.0.0.  Knowing that the
>> window for -2 validations is currently 9/22/2021 also plays into our
>> planning effort.  If we need to develop a supplemental, or ancillary,
>> FOM provider for 3.0 to include content that we need that did not make
>> into the core 3.0 FOM we, too, would like to get one last -2 validation in.
> By "the content list" I assume you mean the list of algorithms that we
> plan to validate. If you take a look at Appendix 3 of our original
> design doc you can see the planned list:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/docs/OpenSSL300Design.html
>
> Matt