resumption problem

[Jeremy Harris]

On 24/03/2020 20:25, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> I'm guessing it is not the first.  The second would an issue with a
>>> particular issuer on the CA list (does Exim configure a list of CAs to
>>> send to the server?),
>>
>> I don't think so

Looks like I'm wrong, from the behaviour.

It's the second of the possible places, and "i" is 129.
It appears to be failing the   WPACKET_sub_allocate_bytes_u16()
call.  %rsi before the call, which I think should be
the "namelen" arg, has value 172.
-- 
Cheers,
  Jeremy