OpenSSL API CRL Revoke Check: Coverage
bl4ck ness
bl4cknesstr at gmail.com
Tue Aug 31 19:19:07 UTC 2021
Thanks for the clarification David. Your help is much appreciated.
David von Oheimb <dev at ddvo.net>, 31 Ağu 2021 Sal, 08:50 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> Hello Dennis,
>
> here are answers to your questions.
>
>
> - All CRL signatures are (by default) verified - otherwise status
> checking by CRLs would be insecure. The function used is def_crl_verify()
> in crypto/x509/x_crl.c
> - All CRLs are kept in the X509_STORE such that they can be reused for
> multiple cert verification calls, which typically have their own
> X509_STORE_CTX.
> When the cert chain has been build during verification of the target
> cert,
> the public keys of the intermediate (untrusted, but then verified) CA
> certs are used to verify the CRL signatures.
> - One needs to interpret "Untrusted objects should not be added in
> this way." in the context of the preceding sentence :
> "X509_STORE_add_cert() and X509_STORE_add_crl() add the respective
> object to the X509_STORE's local storage."
> Certs can be trusted or not, but CRLs are not trusted by themselves.
> So the above sentence is in fact a bit misleading
> and should better be re-phrased to: "Untrusted certificates should not
> be added in this way."
>
> Regards,
>
> David
> On 28.08.21 03:52, bl4ck ness wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use OpenSSL to validate a certificate chain with CRLs. To
> achieve this, I create a X509_STORE and add trusted (root) certificates
> into it via X509_STORE_add_cert(). I also add CRLs published by root and
> intermediate CAs into the store using X509_STORE_add_crl(). Then I create a
> X509_STORE_CTX for this store and using X509_STORE_CTX_init() function I
> set intermediate certs via its chain parameter and target (leaf) cert via
> its x509 parameter.
>
> When I verify cert chain using X509_verify_cert:
>
> - Are these CRLs checked for a valid digital signature (both CRLs root
> & intermediate) ?
> - Since store should only contain trusted root certificates why should
> I add CRLs published by intermediate certificates into the store but not to
> somewhere else (for example ctx)?
> - Documentation for X509_STORE_add_crl "Untrusted objects should not
> be added in this way". What does this mean?
>
>
> Dennis K.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20210831/311012a0/attachment.html>
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list