ASN1 <-> DER encoding with application tag
Russ Housley
housley at vigilsec.com
Thu Nov 4 16:29:11 UTC 2021
The data is not correct if it supposed to match RFC 2743.
The first byte is [APPLICATION 0]. That seems fine.
The second byte provides a length for the full SEQUENCE. It says there are 126 bytes, but you do not have that many.
Russ
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 10:18 AM, Max Larsson <max.larsson at facilityboss.biz> wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> do you mean that the DER data
>
> 0x60 0x7e 0x06 0x06 0x2b 0x06 0x01 0x05 0x05 0x02 0xa0 0x74
>
> is wrong?
>
> If so, that DER data have I captured with wireshark from an smb2 session setup request.
> and that’s even I try to decode with help of openssl. If the case is that that data is wrongly,
> is there a way to get decode with openssl anyway?
>
> Max
>
> From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com <mailto:housley at vigilsec.com>>
> Date: Thursday, 4. November 2021 at 15:08
> To: Max Larsson <max.larsson at facilityboss.biz <mailto:max.larsson at facilityboss.biz>>
> Cc: openssl-users at openssl.org <mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org> <openssl-users at openssl.org <mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org>>
> Subject: Re: ASN1 <-> DER encoding with application tag
>
> RFC 2743 shows this structure:
> MechType ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
> -- data structure definitions
> -- callers must be able to distinguish among
> -- InitialContextToken, SubsequentContextToken,
> -- PerMsgToken, and SealedMessage data elements
> -- based on the usage in which they occur
>
> InitialContextToken ::=
> -- option indication (delegation, etc.) indicated within
> -- mechanism-specific token
> [APPLICATION 0] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE {
> thisMech MechType,
> innerContextToken ANY DEFINED BY thisMech
> -- contents mechanism-specific
> -- ASN.1 structure not required
> }
> The encoded data that you provided dies begin with the [APPLICATION 0] tag, then it if followed by by the { 1 3 6 1 5 5 2 } object identifier.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2021, at 9:58 AM, Max Larsson <max.larsson at facilityboss.biz <mailto:max.larsson at facilityboss.biz>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m trying to decode and encode Der structure. In my case that are DER encoded GSSAPI structure.
>
> My DER encoded data looks like this (stripped the pending bytes):
>
> 0x60 0x7e 0x06 0x06 0x2b 0x06 0x01 0x05 0x05 0x02 0xa0 0x74
>
> My ANS1 definition in my source look like this:
>
> typedef struct ContextToken_st {
> ASN1_OBJECT *mech;
> ASN1_OCTET_STRING *innerContextToken;
> } GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN;
>
> DECLARE_ASN1_FUNCTIONS( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN )
>
> ASN1_SEQUENCE( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN ) = {
> ASN1_SIMPLE( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN, mech, ASN1_OBJECT ),
> ASN1_SIMPLE( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN, innerContextToken, ASN1_OCTET_STRING )
> } ASN1_SEQUENCE_END( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN )
>
> IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS( GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN )
>
> Parsing the above DER data fails, so I decided to encode a own Der structure, to see where the difference is with my setup:
>
> . . .
> negToken = GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN_new();
> if( negToken != NULL ) {
> negToken->mech = OBJ_txt2obj( "1.3.6.1.5.5.2",0 );
> negToken->innerContextToken = ASN1_OCTET_STRING_new();
>
> const unsigned char mechToken[] = "\xa0\x74\x30 // … stripped for readability
>
> const size_t mechTokenSize = sizeof( mechToken ) - 1;
> printf( "Size of inner token: %zu\n",mechTokenSize );
> ASN1_OCTET_STRING_set( negToken->innerContextToken,mechToken,mechTokenSize );
>
> buffer = NULL;
> size_t bufferSize = i2d_GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN( negToken,NULL );
>
> printf( "Required buffer size for DER encoding of ASN1 structure: %zu\n",bufferSize );
>
> unsigned char *buffer = malloc( bufferSize );
> unsigned char *p = buffer;
> i2d_GSSAPI_CONTEXTTOKEN( negToken,&p );
>
> for( int len = 0;len < bufferSize;len++ ) {
> if( ( len % 8 ) == 0 )
> printf( " " );
> if( ( len % 16 ) == 0 )
> printf( "\n\t\t" );
> printf( " 0x%02x",(short)buffer[ len ] );
> }
> printf( "\n" );
> . . .
>
> The code above output the following DER encoded structure (the difference marled in bold):
>
> 0x30 0x81 0x80 0x06 0x06 0x2b 0x06 0x01 0x05 0x05 0x02 0x04 0x76 0xa0 0x74
>
> The google result, which I found seems to point into the direction to use application tags to encode.
>
> But I haven’t found any example or how to how to achieve this with openssl, can anyone give me sone hints?
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Max Larsson
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Best regards
> Dipl.-Inform. Max Larsson
> Geschäftsleitung
> phone: +49(0)6151/62908-75
> fax:
> email: max.larsson at facilityboss.biz <mailto:max.larsson at facilityboss.biz>
> web: http://facilityboss.biz <http://facilityboss.biz/>
> <http://facilityboss.biz/>
> Bad Nauheimer Str. 4
> 64289 Darmstadt
> Germany
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Darmstadt
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 86193
> Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Inform Max Lars Robert Larsson
>
> Diese E-Mail enthält unter Umständen vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen, die allein für den Adressaten bestimmt sind. Wenn Sie nicht der zutreffende Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, ist jede Verwendung, Verbreitung, Kopie oder Bezugnahme auf den Inhalt dieser E-Mail verboten. Bitte informieren Sie uns über einen eventuellen Irrtum per Telefon, per Telefax oder E-Mail.
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or reference on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us by e-mail, facsimile or phone call.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20211104/54c133cd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list