OpenSSL 1.1 on OSX
Dr Paul Dale
pauli at openssl.org
Sat Nov 20 06:47:53 UTC 2021
An alternative would be to statically link libssl and libcrypto. No
more dependencies.
Pauli
On 20/11/21 3:48 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:38:39PM +1100, Grahame Grieve wrote:
>
>> I agree it's sure not a core openSSL issue. But surely lots of people
>> want to use openSSL in cross platform apps and openSSL is interested
>> in adoption issues?
> Most of the users here are building applications that are not notarised,
> and so work with the upstream builds.
>
>> Anyway, it looks like I now have to figure out how to maintain a
>> custom build of openSSL :-(
> It shouldn't be too difficult to execute the build, once you've figured
> out the actual requirements. Apparently you need to make sure that
> signed code has very explicit dependencies, which makes some sense, so
> the libraries bundled with the application need to be built in a way
> that can be verified along with the application.
>
> My best guess is that Apple are not specifically picking on OpenSSL
> here, and similar issues would arise with any other libraries you'd
> want to package with your application. Good luck.
>
> Feel free to share your findings. Perhaps someone will then help
> you find a way to improve on them, or to add a template to the
> build to support this going forward...
>
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list