an oldie but a goodie .. ISO C90 does not support 'long long'

[Phillip Susi]

Michael Wojcik via openssl-users <openssl-users at openssl.org> writes:

> I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward
> compatibility, C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century
> ago. OpenSSL 1.x is younger than C99. It doesn't seem like an
> unreasonable requirement.

That and there is no substitute for it.