OpenSSL version 3.3.0-beta1 published

[Richard Levitte]

Hmmm, shouldn't the tests be written to be agnostic of the exact IP
version that's enabled?  I.e. if IPv4 was still enabled, it should have
worked.

Cheers,
Richard

Dennis Clarke via openssl-users <openssl-users at openssl.org> writes:

> On 3/29/24 20:51, Dennis Clarke via openssl-users wrote:
>> On 3/29/24 10:58, OpenSSL wrote:
>>>
>>>     OpenSSL version 3.3 beta 1 released
>>>     ===================================
>>>
>> Strange. The alpha1 release was flawless and the beta1 claims :
>> 65-test_cmp_asn.t ....................... ok
>>      # ERROR: (ptr) 'res != NULL' failed @
>> test/cmp_client_test.c:138
>>      # 0x0
>>      # CMP info: received IP
>>      # CMP info: received 'waiting' PKIStatus, starting to poll for
>> response
>>      # CMP info: received POLLREP
>>      # CMP info: received polling response; checkAfter = 1 seconds
>>      # CMP info: received IP
>>      # CMP info: received final response after polling
>>      # CMP info: received ERROR (waiting)
>>      # CMP info: received 'waiting' PKIStatus, starting to poll for
>> response
>>      # CMP info: received POLLREP
>>      # CMP info: received polling response; checkAfter = 1 seconds
>>      # CMP error: total timeout
>>      # CMP error: polling failed
>>      # OPENSSL_TEST_RAND_SEED=1711756120
>>      not ok 8 - test_exec_IR_ses_poll_no_timeout
>> #
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ../../util/wrap.pl ../../test/cmp_client_test
>> ../../test/recipes/65-test_cmp_client_data/server.key
>> ../../test/recipes/65-test_cmp_client_data/server.crt
>> ../../test/recipes/65-test_cmp_client_data/client.key
>> ../../test/recipes/65-test_cmp_client_data/client.crt
>> ../../test/recipes/65-test_cmp_client_data/client.csr none => 1
>> not ok 1
>> #
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.65-test_cmp_client.t
>> ....................
>> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> Failed 1/2 subtests
>> This is on a Gentoo Linux server. Actually it is Itanium IA64
>> hardware.
>> The real thing.
>> In any case the testsuite is running but thus far the above has
>> failed
>> strangely whereas the alpha1 stuff was flawless. Very strange.
>> 
> Sheesh, darn it, never mind, I had IPv6 disabled.
> So please ignore the noise.
>
>
> --
> Dennis Clarke
> RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
> UNIX and Linux spoken
>

-- 
-- 
Richard Levitte         levitte at openssl.org
OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/