Need help - upgrading openssl version from 3.0.12 to 3.2.x version

[Tomas Mraz]

Hi,
the 3.2 version should be fully API and ABI compatible with 3.0
version. I would not anticipate any changes would be required for the
migration. For more details on the changes please refer to the
CHANGES.md and NEWS.md files in the 3.2 version releases.

Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL

On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 14:52 +0000, Prasad, PCRaghavendra wrote:
> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> If we migrate from 3.0.x to 3.2.x directly do we need to take care of
> any use cases, we are carrying OpenSSL (libcrypto and libssl) in our
> python application and use them during the encryption/decryption,
> handshake etc.
> 
> So should we take care of any specific things as part of the
> migration as it is a major change from 3.0.x to 3.2.x. ( will there
> be any specific code changes or config changes we as an application
> need to consider)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> Internal Use - Confidential
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 1:14 PM
> To: Prasad, PCRaghavendra; Wall, Stephen; openssl-users at openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Need help - upgrading openssl version from 3.0.12 to
> 3.2.x version
> 
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> 
> For FIPS compliance you definitely need to use the validated version
> of a FIPS provider. Please see the instructions here [1] on how to
> combine the latest release with a validated FIPS provider version.
> 
> [1]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/README-FIPS.md__;!!LpKI!jLMp7kblHEfwy_-l1pml2BUrIGyDrS0buy7NkQJ9AnH48CNuu5pkshNIHT4nJ8wBN0wuiDin47HZyuaShgEZPQ$
>  [github[.]com]
> 
> Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
> 
> On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 05:55 +0000, Prasad, PCRaghavendra wrote:
> > Thanks, Tomas,
> > 
> > So we can use OpenSSL 3.2.0 and enable fips during the build step
> > and
> > get the fips.so
> > 
> > OR
> > 
> > we should take the OpenSSL 3.2.0 code and then take the FIPS
> > provider
> > from the OpenSSL 3.0.8 or 3.0.9 and build, then get the fips.so,
> > fipsmodule.cnf and combine with OpenSSL 3.2.0
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Raghu
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org> On Behalf
> > Of
> > Tomas Mraz
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 9:05 AM
> > To: Wall, Stephen; openssl-users at openssl.org
> > Subject: Re: Need help - upgrading openssl version from 3.0.12 to
> > 3.2.x version
> > 
> > 
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> > 
> > On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 22:38 +0000, Wall, Stephen wrote:
> > > > Please note that we actually test running the 3.0.8 and 3.0.9
> > > > validated versions of the FIPS provider with the 3.2 OpenSSL in
> > > > the CI and it works. We are not aware of any problems with
> > > > running
> > > > the validated versions of the FIPS provider with the current
> > > > OpenSSL versions.
> > > 
> > > OK, so
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/
> > > 23400__;!!LpKI!m4FTaZF0-kz3NQm8Y9WvC4n233dgbq01QmEc_C-
> > > 2XrCWwWFFRtkaMjD
> > > i6t8tcws2hmT529ayVVlzqPunWH8qZw$ [github[.]com] doesn't actually
> > > prevent OpenSSL from working, it's just an issue with `openssl
> > > fipsinstall`.  I hadn't followed it closely enough, just briefly
> > > saw some some messages go past.
> > 
> > Yeah, that issue is not really preventing the 3.0.x FIPS provider
> > working with subsequent OpenSSL releases. It's just a matter of a
> > minor FIPS compliance issue. (Depending on different views it might
> > matter for the FIPS compliance or not.)
> > 
> > > Good to know.  Will the same apply to the 140-3 module and
> > > OpenSSL
> > > 3.2?
> > 
> > Yes, that is and always was the intention. The FIPS provider is
> > built
> > in a way that it can be used with any other version and the same
> > applies to third party providers.
> > 
> > --
> > Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
> > 
> 
> --
> Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL
> 

-- 
Tomáš Mráz, OpenSSL