<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Title" content="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Courier;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Courier;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Hi Neetish,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">I would recommend considering the following in your research:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">- The impact of Nagle. See
<a href="https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/4237">https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/4237</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">- The impact of the KeyShare calculation on TLS 1.3 session resumption (assuming most deployments will use psk_dhe_ke)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">- The impact of post-handshake handshake messages.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Roelof<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces@openssl.org> on behalf of Neetish Pathak <npathak2@ncsu.edu><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>"openssl-users@openssl.org" <openssl-users@openssl.org><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 4:20 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"openssl-users@openssl.org" <openssl-users@openssl.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[EXT] [openssl-users] TLS 1.3 performance<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Hi, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">I worked on TLS 1.3 performance bench-marking. After my tests, I found that TLS 1.3 based resumption is not giving us the connection latency benefits when tested in a LAN environment. It is slower than TLS 1.2.
When tested on WAN, definitely, TLS 1.3 fares better than TLS 1.2. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">I want your suggestion on whether can I work on the following problem for my research project:
<b>"Investigating why TLS 1.3 resumption/0-RTT/full-handshake doesn't provide the desired connection latency benefits in LAN and the ways to make it faster?"</b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">I want suggestions/references on the right research problem. Any ideas will be appreciated.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Thanks in advance<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Thanks<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Neetish<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>