<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi Richard, all,<br>
</p>
<p>I tried to do the forward declaration also for the TEST_SIGNATURE
together with the TEST one, but that did not really work :( It is
still complaining about the use of 'sizeof' on an incomplete type.
In particular, the two errors are:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>src/ocspv2/****: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TEST_it'<br>
ASN1_EXP_SEQUENCE_OF_OPT(TEST_TBS, otherTests, TEST, 5),<br>
^</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>src/ocspv2/****: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an
incomplete type 'const ASN1_TEMPLATE []'<br>
} ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST_TBS)<br>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I guess I need to checkout the macros a bit more.. :D <br>
</p>
<p>Question: does anybody know if there is any other structure
already implemented in OpenSSL that resembles the one I am trying
to do here? I tried to look for something similar, but no
success.. :D <br>
</p>
<p>If there is no easy answer, I guess I will have to either change
the envisioned approach (maybe introducing an intermediate data
structure of some kind..?) or use the ASN1_ANY approach.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br>
Max<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/2/17 4:54 AM, Richard Levitte
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20171202.125408.1222423086056733693.levitte@openssl.org">
<pre wrap="">In message <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:d1eeba62-f25f-c984-dc77-94a150cf73c1@openca.org"><d1eeba62-f25f-c984-dc77-94a150cf73c1@openca.org></a> on Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:22:09 -0700, "Dr. Pala" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:madwolf@openca.org"><madwolf@openca.org></a> said:
madwolf> Hi Richard,
madwolf>
madwolf> thanks :D That worked. I have a new challenge for you now. Here's what
madwolf> I am trying to do:
madwolf>
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TEST);
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TBS_TEST) = {
madwolf> ASN1_SIMPLE(TBS_TEST, version, ASN1_INTEGER),
madwolf> ASN1_EXP_SEQUENCE_OF_OPT(TBS_TEST, otherTests, TEST, 0)
madwolf> } ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST)
madwolf>
madwolf> IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(TBS_TEST) [**]
madwolf>
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TEST) = {
madwolf> ASN1_SIMPLE(TEST, tbsTest, ASN1_INTEGER),
madwolf> ASN1_EXP_OPT(TEST, optionalSignature, TEST_SIGNATURE, 0)
madwolf> } ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST)
madwolf>
madwolf> IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(TEST) [**]
madwolf>
madwolf> In this case, the difference is that TBS_TEST has, inside the
madwolf> otherTests that are of type TEST. The TEST is built out of a tbsTest
madwolf> and an optionalSignature - but it is defined after TBS_TEST.
madwolf>
madwolf> What to do in this case ?
It seems to me that you need to do some kind of forward declaration of
TEST_SIGNATURE as well, before the construction of TEST. (also, to be
picky, you need to make sure that ASN1_SEQUENCE(TBS_TEST) is ended
with ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TBS_TEST), not ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST))
Cheers,
Richard
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>