<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi ,<div><br></div><div>The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them correctly.</div><div><br></div><div><div>openssl 1.1.0e : </div><div>The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.</div><div>type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes</div><div>sha1 65019.16k 151552.49k 266107.41k 337113.93k 360792.93k 364102.89k</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>openssl 1.1.1 : </div><div>The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.</div><div>type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes</div><div>sha1 10641.28k 21433.09k 38464.85k 48496.92k 49381.38k 51755.48k</div><div><br></div></div><div>could any one please confirm if my interpretation is correct ? </div><div>I doubt any issue with openssl 1.1.1 version with such wider user base. </div><div>How to debug this further ? </div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and Regards,</div><div>Ram Krushna</div><div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:59 AM ramakrushna mishra <<a href="mailto:rama.krushna7@gmail.com">rama.krushna7@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>Could anyone please help me wth it.</div><div><br></div><div>Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.</div><div><br></div><div><div>sslc speed sha1</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16858430 sha1's in 2.98s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 14147528 sha1's in 3.00s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 6436755 sha1's in 2.99s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 2055335 sha1's in 3.00s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 266404 sha1's in 2.99s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 152376 sha1's in 3.00s</div><div>OpenSSL 1.1.0e 16 Feb 2017</div><div>built on: reproducible build, date unspecified</div><div>options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)</div><div>compiler: gcc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DNDEBUG -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_STATIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPADLOCK_ASM -DOPENSSLDIR="\"/vobs_prgs/tools/linuxx86_64/openssl/install\"" -DENGINESDIR="\"/vobs_prgs/tools/linuxx86_64/openssl/install/lib/engines-1.1\""</div><div>The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.</div><div>type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes</div><div>sha1 90515.06k 301813.93k 551106.78k 701554.35k 729893.50k 832176.13k</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sslc speed sha1</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16939397 sha1's in 2.99s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 11489920 sha1's in 3.00s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 5316410 sha1's in 2.99s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 2006834 sha1's in 3.00s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 273661 sha1's in 2.98s</div><div>Doing sha1 for 3s on 16384 size blocks: 150159 sha1's in 2.99s</div><div>OpenSSL 1.1.1 11 Sep 2018</div><div>built on: Tue Feb 12 18:18:22 2019 UTC</div><div>options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)</div><div>compiler: gcc -fPIC -pthread -m64 -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC -DOPENSSL_USE_NODELETE -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DX25519_ASM -DPADLOCK_ASM -DNDEBUG -fPIC</div><div>The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.</div><div>type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes</div><div>sha1 90645.60k 245118.29k 455184.27k 684999.34k 752292.25k 822811.06k</div></div><div><br></div><div>Does not this means 1.1.1 process lesser number of bytes per second compared to 1.1.0e ?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and Regards,</div><div>Ram Krushna </div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:46 PM Salz, Rich <<a href="mailto:rsalz@akamai.com" target="_blank">rsalz@akamai.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_2404920302253807459gmail-m_-2272850692104527478WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12pt">> </span></b>Could you please look into the program and let me know if anything I am doing wrong ? <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">> Or else What could be the issue ? <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sorry, no not me. Maybe someone else on the list has ideas.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>