<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000099" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 31/05/2019 16:23, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:78f27aca-3e65-6624-3385-e022eb06cd33@wisemo.com">On
30/05/2019 02:10, Michael Wojcik wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">From: openssl-users
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:openssl-users-bounces@openssl.org">mailto:openssl-users-bounces@openssl.org</a>] On Behalf Of J. J.
Farrell
<br>
On 29/05/2019 18:39, ramakrushna mishra wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">In Openssl 1.1.1, the file
"rc4-ia64.pl" is missing. This cause degradation of
<br>
performance on AIX. ...
<br>
</blockquote>
The AIX port to Itanium was never released as a product, and
was abandoned
<br>
altogether in 2002; I'm surprised that a degradation of
performance on it
<br>
matters to anyone.
<br>
</blockquote>
What, no love for unobtainable archaic platforms?
<br>
</blockquote>
Note that while the OP may actually be running AIX (old beta or
special
<br>
contract), IA64 had publicly released OS versions of Linux, HP-UX,
Windows
<br>
(NT 5.01 to NT 6.01) and possibly others. Linux IA64 may or may
not be in
<br>
some supported distributions (in addition to site OS builds),
don't know
<br>
the status of HP-UX IA64, <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
As I understand it, HP-UX on IA64 has normal "factory" support
through to the end of 2025 "at least"; I expect there'll be options
to pay a lot for support beyond the end of factory support.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
J. J. Farrell
Not speaking for Oracle</pre>
</body>
</html>