[ech] ECH PR reviews...

[Kurt Roeckx]

I haven't looked at the PR, but if you have time, it would be nice that you could look at fuzzing. One option for that is disabling the encryption in a fuzz build so that the normal fuzzers can reach the new functions. That would be done based on the FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION define.

Kurt 

On December 11, 2023 1:09:19 PM GMT+01:00, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>Hiya,
>
>Just checking if there's anything I can do to help folks
>do more review of the ECH PR? [1] I realise it's a monster
>(apologies again for that), but it'd be great if I could
>get some substantive reviews before the holidays, as I'll
>probably have an easier time working on changes before the
>new teaching semester starts in mid-Jan.
>
>If that requires me to point you at what I suspect may be
>the bits you'll hate, I'm fine doing that:-)
>
>If some call(s) help, that's also ok.
>
>If this is more a matter of people who'd like to review
>needing to get a bit of time for that over the holidays,
>that's of course also ok, and very understandable, but be
>great to know if that's the case.
>
>Cheers,
>S.
>
>[1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22938
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/ech/attachments/20231211/7fc68c9d/attachment.htm>