[openssl-commits] [web] master update

[Kurt Roeckx]

The branch master has been updated
       via  c03cae415e39443604cce5bc9172110a8eb693d8 (commit)
      from  9d876466604fb3489594d4819dc0c8c4b530b9b4 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit c03cae415e39443604cce5bc9172110a8eb693d8
Author: Jörn Heissler <joernheissler at users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Tue Dec 26 11:36:48 2017 +0100

    Fix duplicate words in in codingstyle.txt
    
    Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx.be>
    Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh at cryptsoft.com>
    GH: #33

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 policies/codingstyle.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/policies/codingstyle.txt b/policies/codingstyle.txt
index 9be0b7d..db21c44 100644
--- a/policies/codingstyle.txt
+++ b/policies/codingstyle.txt
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ This example is wrong:
 
     s = sizeof( struct file );
 
-When declaring pointer data or a function that returns a pointer type, the
+When declaring pointer data or a function that returns a pointer type,
 the asterisk goes next to the data or function name, and not the type:
 
     char *openssl_banner;
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ Windows headers use X509 and X590_NAME. Consider using a prefix, as with
 CMS_ContentInfo, if the name is common or generic. Of course, you often
 don't find out until the code is ported to other platforms.
 
-A final word on struct's. OpenSSL has has historically made all struct
+A final word on struct's. OpenSSL has historically made all struct
 definitions public; this has caused problems with maintaining binary
 compatibility and adding features. Our stated direction is to have struct's
 be opaque and only expose pointers in the API. The actual struct definition