[openssl-commits] [openssl] master update

Richard Levitte levitte at openssl.org
Wed Jun 13 08:27:17 UTC 2018


The branch master has been updated
       via  55c5c1b63a5f2497e26d734d597c40e4a36fe4af (commit)
      from  0df65d82dbc41e8da00adb243de5918db532c8a6 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 55c5c1b63a5f2497e26d734d597c40e4a36fe4af
Author: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 13 00:29:48 2018 +0200

    doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod: Make consistent
    
    The man name didn't match the file name, and some places had
    'password' instead of 'pass phrase'.
    
    Fixes #6474
    
    Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz at openssl.org>
    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6476)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod b/doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod
index d5c9d1e..6810844 100644
--- a/doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod
+++ b/doc/man7/passphrase-encoding.pod
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 =head1 NAME
 
-password encoding
+passphrase-encoding
 - How diverse parts of OpenSSL treat pass phrases character encoding
 
 =head1 DESCRIPTION
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ OpenSSL still does this, to be able to read files produced with older versions.
 
 It should be noted that this approach isn't entirely fault free.
 
-A passphrase encoded in ISO-8859-2 could very well have a sequence such as
+A pass phrase encoded in ISO-8859-2 could very well have a sequence such as
 0xC3 0xAF (which is the two characters "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH BREVE"
 and "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH DOT ABOVE" in ISO-8859-2 encoding), but would
 be misinterpreted as the perfectly valid UTF-8 encoded code point U+00EF (LATIN
-SMALL LETTER I WITH DIARESIS) I<if the passphrase doesn't contain anything that
+SMALL LETTER I WITH DIARESIS) I<if the pass phrase doesn't contain anything that
 would be invalid UTF-8>.
 A pass phrase that contains this kind of byte sequence will give a different
 outcome in OpenSSL 1.1.0 and newer than in OpenSSL older than 1.1.0.
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ following:
 
 =item 1.
 
-Try the password that you have as it is in the character encoding of your
+Try the pass phrase that you have as it is in the character encoding of your
 environment.
 It's possible that its byte sequence is exactly right.
 


More information about the openssl-commits mailing list