[openssl] master update

[Dr. Paul Dale]

The branch master has been updated
       via  e9cfa192019574a75fbeca4811c10635a9049381 (commit)
      from  f997e456b9bd43af275aab90c727a52287467e98 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit e9cfa192019574a75fbeca4811c10635a9049381
Author: Pauli <paul.dale at oracle.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 8 14:28:59 2019 +1000

    Avoid alignment problems in params API.
    
    Using a byte buffer causes problems for device that don't handle unaligned
    reads.  Instead use the properly aligned variable that was already pointed at.
    
    Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8696)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 test/params_api_test.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/params_api_test.c b/test/params_api_test.c
index 94487d6..c78a42b 100644
--- a/test/params_api_test.c
+++ b/test/params_api_test.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static int test_param_int(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_int(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -174,7 +173,6 @@ static int test_param_long(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_long(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -201,7 +199,6 @@ static int test_param_uint(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_uint(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -229,7 +226,6 @@ static int test_param_ulong(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_ulong(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -257,7 +253,6 @@ static int test_param_int32(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_int32(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -285,7 +280,6 @@ static int test_param_uint32(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_uint32(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -313,7 +307,6 @@ static int test_param_int64(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_int64(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -341,7 +334,6 @@ static int test_param_uint64(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_uint64(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));
@@ -369,7 +361,6 @@ static int test_param_size_t(int n)
     if (!TEST_mem_eq(cmp, len, raw_values[n].value, len))
         return 0;
     in = 0;
-    param.data = buf;
     if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_size_t(&param, &in)))
         return 0;
     le_copy(cmp, &in, sizeof(in));