[openssl] master update

[Richard Levitte]

The branch master has been updated
       via  f7f2a55aeee12926a7080d75d38f03467eb1ac44 (commit)
      from  16161a30f2d432dc851a67d0ba24c0fa738e0767 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit f7f2a55aeee12926a7080d75d38f03467eb1ac44
Author: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Date:   Sat Mar 16 10:43:48 2019 +0100

    test/params_api_test.c: fix size_t assumptions
    
    size_t isn't always as large as a int64_t, so the compiler complains
    about possible data loss.  In this case, we are in control, so a
    simple cast will do.
    
    Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com>
    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/8497)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 test/params_api_test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/params_api_test.c b/test/params_api_test.c
index 77b8af4..97c8a9d 100644
--- a/test/params_api_test.c
+++ b/test/params_api_test.c
@@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ static int test_param_type_extra(const OSSL_PARAM *param, unsigned char *cmp,
         if (signd) {
             if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_set_int32(param, 12345))
                 || !TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_int64(param, &i64))
-                || !TEST_size_t_eq(i64, 12345))
+                || !TEST_size_t_eq((size_t)i64, 12345))
                 return 0;
         } else {
             if (!TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_set_uint32(param, 12345))
                 || !TEST_true(OSSL_PARAM_get_uint64(param, (uint64_t *)&i64))
-                || !TEST_size_t_eq(i64, 12345))
+                || !TEST_size_t_eq((size_t)i64, 12345))
                 return 0;
         }
     }