[openssl/openssl] debd92: Revert "Use .s extension for ia64 assembler"

[Richard Levitte]

  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl
  Commit: debd9210061206be1b5b6e957033c1b85ac540e1
      https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/debd9210061206be1b5b6e957033c1b85ac540e1
  Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
  Date:   2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)

  Changed paths:
    M crypto/chacha/build.info
    A crypto/poly1305/asm/poly1305-ia64.S
    R crypto/poly1305/asm/poly1305-ia64.s
    M crypto/poly1305/build.info

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Revert "Use .s extension for ia64 assembler"

This reverts commit 6009997abd2594d5a7c0606176f404190922b74d.

The .s extension is incorrect as the assembler files contain
preprocessor directives.

Fixes #18259

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)


  Commit: db24ed54302ed458d41ad85093e4189db4b2120b
      https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/db24ed54302ed458d41ad85093e4189db4b2120b
  Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
  Date:   2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)

  Changed paths:
    M crypto/chacha/build.info
    M crypto/poly1305/build.info

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Generate the preprocessed .s files for chacha and poly 1305 on ia64

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)


  Commit: 42b4a8ab961e3d3be4abffe3aea458448b2e47b4
      https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/42b4a8ab961e3d3be4abffe3aea458448b2e47b4
  Author: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
  Date:   2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)

  Changed paths:
    M Configurations/gentemplate.pm

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Configurations/gentemplate.pm: Generate generators too, when necessary

A generator in a `GENERATE[generated]=generator` build.info statement may
itself be generated.  That needs to be taken into account.

This was always meant to be, but we missed the spot, for lack of use cases.
Now we have one.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)


Compare: https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/compare/737e849fd938...42b4a8ab961e