[openssl/openssl] debd92: Revert "Use .s extension for ia64 assembler"
Richard Levitte
noreply at reply.github.openssl.org
Fri May 27 06:11:53 UTC 2022
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl
Commit: debd9210061206be1b5b6e957033c1b85ac540e1
https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/debd9210061206be1b5b6e957033c1b85ac540e1
Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
Date: 2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)
Changed paths:
M crypto/chacha/build.info
A crypto/poly1305/asm/poly1305-ia64.S
R crypto/poly1305/asm/poly1305-ia64.s
M crypto/poly1305/build.info
Log Message:
-----------
Revert "Use .s extension for ia64 assembler"
This reverts commit 6009997abd2594d5a7c0606176f404190922b74d.
The .s extension is incorrect as the assembler files contain
preprocessor directives.
Fixes #18259
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)
Commit: db24ed54302ed458d41ad85093e4189db4b2120b
https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/db24ed54302ed458d41ad85093e4189db4b2120b
Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
Date: 2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)
Changed paths:
M crypto/chacha/build.info
M crypto/poly1305/build.info
Log Message:
-----------
Generate the preprocessed .s files for chacha and poly 1305 on ia64
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)
Commit: 42b4a8ab961e3d3be4abffe3aea458448b2e47b4
https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/commit/42b4a8ab961e3d3be4abffe3aea458448b2e47b4
Author: Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org>
Date: 2022-05-27 (Fri, 27 May 2022)
Changed paths:
M Configurations/gentemplate.pm
Log Message:
-----------
Configurations/gentemplate.pm: Generate generators too, when necessary
A generator in a `GENERATE[generated]=generator` build.info statement may
itself be generated. That needs to be taken into account.
This was always meant to be, but we missed the spot, for lack of use cases.
Now we have one.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas at openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18263)
Compare: https://github.openssl.org/openssl/openssl/compare/737e849fd938...42b4a8ab961e
More information about the openssl-commits
mailing list