[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3607] nistz256 is broken.

[Adam Langley via RT]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Adam Langley <agl at google.com> wrote:
> Thanks. So far that version is good to ~1B random tests. I'll leave it
> going until Monday.

It's good for ~6B random tests.

Of course, that's not as compelling for 64-bit code as it would be for
32-bit, but I think we can safely say that there aren't any
low-hanging bugs left.

Thanks Andy.


Cheers

AGL