[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4194] engine command regression in 1.1

[Roumen Petrov via RT]

Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> I don't know that I would call it a regression, but rather a difference. :)
> I'll fix the summary but not the old uncommon behavior.

Unlike other commands engine is flexible and documented behaviour (see 
previous post with quoted text).
As result in samples first is engine name then commands.
Just search in internet for samples - expect some recent openssl 
tutorial almost all other samples use name before options.

Request is only for engine. It is not for speed command for example.

This is reason to call issue regression.

Regards,
Roumen Petrov