[openssl-dev] Seeking feedback on some #ifdef changes

[Corinna Vinschen]

On Jan 23 20:27, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > For those of the flags controlling OS capabilities, it would be nice to have a
> > brief description so the OS-specific maintainers can check removing some of
                                                             ^^^
                                                there was an "if" missing

> > them might be a problem.
> 
> I don't think I understand what you mean, but the only OS related one
> is NO_BUF_FREELISTS, which has openssl create a cache of buffers for
> systems where malloc and free are too slow.

I was just asking if some of the flags handle OS-specific differences
and if so, it would be nice to know which ones and what they were
doing.  This way platform maintainers of OpenSSL (Cygwin in my case)
would know if they might get into trouble.

But you already answered my question and it sounds like there's nothing
to worry about :)


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20150123/41e824c2/attachment.sig>