[openssl-dev] A new openssl engine

[Alexander Gostrer]

Hi Rich,

It was my customer's request. I can ask them why:). Personally I think that
it is a good idea to show what hardware is available and supported by
openssl (even if maintained by a private party as a part of their SDK).
Couple years ago I was looking for a good HSM with good openssl support. A
centralized list would help a lot then.

Thank you,
Alex.



On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz at akamai.com> wrote:

> Most folks with crypto hardware usually include and maintain their ENGINE
> manipulation as part of their SDK.  Is there any reason why this approach
> doesn't work here?
>
> --
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> IM: richsalz at jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-dev mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20150625/451c1660/attachment.html>