[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4075] Enhancement request: Camellia ECDHE+GCM suites
Hubert Kario
hkario at redhat.com
Thu Feb 4 16:48:39 UTC 2016
On Thursday 04 February 2016 13:08:15 Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> > That's all we get, a one-liner, no explanation, no rationale,
> > response?
> Take a look at some of the discussion here:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/154
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/148
You mean the "Many thanks for your patch. Applied"? :>
If you see ways in which the code in proposed pull requests is
unmaintainable, share them.
Saying "we may not have resources later" is unconvincing. Especially
given that we're talking just about a new mode created by combining
already implemented cipher and integrity mechanism. Mode necessary to
support an ENISA recommended cipher in TLSv1.3.
--
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20160204/071e13f8/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the openssl-dev
mailing list