[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4267] Missing accessor to the EVP_CIPHER_CTX member oiv

[Richard Levitte via RT]

If you're happy, I'm happy; it's that easy. If you think it's good, then it's
time to close this ticket. You decide.

Cheers,
Richard

Vid Ons, 24 Feb 2016 kl. 17.33.29, skrev beldmit at gmail.com:
> Dear Richard,
>
> The patch you suggested seems not to break at least self-compatibility for
> the smime -enc command.
> Is this enough or should I do some more tests?
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Richard,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. I am out of office now so I will check it some days
> > later.
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Richard Levitte via RT <rt at openssl.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Did that help, can we close this ticket now?
> >>
> >> Vid Ons, 17 Feb 2016 kl. 11.25.26, skrev levitte:
> >> > May I suggest that you use EVP_CIPHER_set_asn1_iv() and/or
> >> > EVP_CIPHER_get_asn1_iv()? With a temporary ASN1_TYPE to which you
> >> > assign
> >> > gcp->iv, that should be perfectly possible, no?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Richard
> >> >
> >> > Vid Ons, 17 Feb 2016 kl. 09.53.04, skrev beldmit at gmail.com:
> >> > > Dear Richard,
> >> > >
> >> > > I am not sure it will not break the compatibility.
> >> > > Both implementations of the GOST ciphers require access to this
> >> > > field.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Richard Levitte via RT
> >> > > <rt at openssl.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm sorry, the oiv field is EVP private. Sure, it's been accessible
> >> > > > (and
> >> > > > thoroughly misused in some cases) when EVP_CIPHER_CTX was open, but
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > essence,
> >> > > > it's a EVP private store of the IV that was given at
> >> > > > EVP_CipherInit().
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you want to retain a copy of the original IV, I suggest you have
> >> > > > one in
> >> > > > GOSTs structure and take a copy of the IV given to the init()
> >> > > > function.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thank you for the reminder, I meant to deal with this further. oiv
> >> > > > should
> >> > > > really not be publically accessible at all, not even as a constant.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > Richard
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Vid Sat, 23 Jan 2016 kl. 09.40.19, skrev beldmit at gmail.com:
> >> > > > > Hello,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > After making the EVP_CIPHER_CTX struct opaque I found that there
> >> > > > > is a
> >> > > > > missing non-const accessor to the oiv member. It is used in GOST
> >> > > > > engine
> >> > > > > when we set the cipher parameters from the ASN1 parameters.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thank you!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Richard Levitte
> >> > > > levitte at openssl.org
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267
> >> > > > Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Richard Levitte
> >> > levitte at openssl.org
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Richard Levitte
> >> levitte at openssl.org
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267
> >> Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
> >
>
>
>


--
Richard Levitte
levitte at openssl.org

-- 
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4267
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted