[openssl-dev] Upcoming build system change
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen at redhat.com
Sun Jan 17 19:33:30 UTC 2016
On Jan 17 18:33, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <20160117172014.GC16440 at calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:20:14 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> said:
>
> vinschen> On Jan 17 18:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> vinschen> > On Jan 17 17:50, Richard Levitte wrote:
> vinschen> > > In message <20160117154353.GC9897 at calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:43:53 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> said:
> vinschen> > >
> vinschen> > > vinschen> On Jan 17 01:04, Richard Levitte wrote:
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > If you have a look in "config", it doesn't generate "Cygwin-x86_64" at
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > all. Would you be willing to have a look at that script and modernise
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > it regarding Cygwin?
> vinschen> > > vinschen>
> vinschen> > > vinschen> Like the attached?
> vinschen> > >
> vinschen> > > Thank you, that helped... it was less traumatic than I imagined ;-)
> vinschen> > > I've attached a small fixup, your thoughts?
> vinschen> >
> vinschen> > Well, that works, too. But if we ever support another architecture,
> vinschen> > we'd have to tweak two files, config and 10-main.conf, rather then just
> vinschen> > one, 10-main.conf.
> vinschen>
> vinschen> Btw., when calling Configure rather than config, i686 would be simpler
> vinschen> for the package builder since it could just use the build variable
> vinschen> ${ARCH}, rather than having to check and explicitely turn this to "x86".
> vinschen>
> vinschen>
> vinschen> Just saying...
>
> I was just thinking of that, as well as a backward compatibility name
> Cygwin.
Looks good to me, as discussed in PM.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20160117/4254227c/attachment.sig>
More information about the openssl-dev
mailing list