[openssl-dev] Missing const EC_KEY *EC_KEY_dup(EC_KEY *src);

Richard Moore richmoore44 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 16:07:04 UTC 2016


I meant to ask, should I make tickets for this and the missing DSA_bits()?

Cheers

Rich.

On 24 July 2016 at 21:05, Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org> wrote:

> In message <
> a62628880fea43fa8505f895c22f03c2 at usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> on
> Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:19:05 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz at akamai.com> said:
>
> rsalz>
> rsalz> > Shouldn't this be  EC_KEY *EC_KEY_dup(const EC_KEY *src);
> rsalz>
> rsalz> I think the reason it is not is because the EC_KEY has an ENGINE*
> and that can't be const.
>
> The pointer to ENGINE will be const, yes, but not the ENGINE content
> itself, as if it was defined like this:
>
>     ENGINE * const engine;
>
> What happens is that the ENGINE pointer is copied to the new
> structure, and the ENGINE itself will work perfectly, both in the
> source EC_KEY and the new one.
>
> So there's no actual reason not to have const there.  It does,
> however, mean that we need to add const in a few more places.  Now
> many at all, actually, it took me 5 minutes.  PR coming tomorrow.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
> --
> Richard Levitte         levitte at openssl.org
> OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
> --
> openssl-dev mailing list
> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20160726/ac44c29d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the openssl-dev mailing list