[openssl-dev] Solaris 10 80-test_ca failure

Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata.de
Fri Mar 4 09:14:46 UTC 2016


Am 03.03.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Erik Forsberg:
>
> I have been having 32-bit only test failures from test_ca
> for quite a while now on Solaris 10 (1.1.pre), Finally figured
> out what is wrong.
>
> I build both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries.
> My /usr/local/bin/perl is always 64-bit,
> used to be required for assembler support.
>
> LD_PRELOAD is used to force newly built libs into the test process
> using util/shlib_wrap.sh
>
> So, when building 32-bit libs, shlib_wrap tries to preload a 32-bit
> libcrypto/libssl into the 64-bit perl process when CA.pl is invoked.
> This causes failure on Solaris 10, but seems to be ignored on Solaris 11.
>
> There was specific support to handle 64-bit builds in shlib_wrap, this
> method also needs to be used for 32-bit builds.
>
> This patch makes it work in all cases for me.
> Someone using SPARC should review what /usr/bin/file
> reports for an old 32-bit SPARC library (if such still exists)
> I have no access to SPARC hardware.

% /usr/bin/file /lib/libc.so.1

/lib/libc.so.1: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC32PLUS Version 1, V8+ 
Required, dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information 
available

% /usr/bin/file /lib/sparcv9/libc.so

/lib/sparcv9/libc.so:   ELF 64-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARCV9 Version 1, 
dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available

This was on Solaris 10 Sparc.

Regards,

Rainer

> *** shlib_wrap.sh       Tue Feb 16 23:55:51 2016
> --- /usr/local/src/openssl-1.1//shlib_wrap.sh   Tue Mar  1 23:21:23 2016
> ***************
> *** 27,32 ****
> --- 27,37 ----
>                  LD_PRELOAD_64="$LIBCRYPTOSO $LIBSSLSO"; export LD_PRELOAD_64
>                  preload_var=LD_PRELOAD_64
>                  ;;
> +       *ELF\ 32*SPARC*|*ELF\ 32*80386*)
> +               [ -n "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32" ] && rld_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH_32
> +               LD_PRELOAD_32="$LIBCRYPTOSO $LIBSSLSO"; export LD_PRELOAD_32
> +               preload_var=LD_PRELOAD_32
> +               ;;
>          # Why are newly built .so's preloaded anyway? Because run-time
>          # .so lookup path embedded into application takes precedence
>          # over LD_LIBRARY_PATH and as result application ends up linking
>



More information about the openssl-dev mailing list