[openssl-dev] 1.1-pre4 documentation fails to install

[Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL]

Yes, that diff fixes the problem, thank you! (Hope to see it in Github :)

On 3/14/16, 11:45, "openssl-dev on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni"
<openssl-dev-bounces at openssl.org on behalf of openssl-users at dukhovni.org>
wrote:

>On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 03:28:13PM +0000, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
>wrote:
>> install ./doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod ->
>>/Users/ur20980/share/man/man3/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.3
>> 
>> IO::File=IO(0x7feb8c8029c0) around line 62: Unterminated B<...> sequence
>> POD document had syntax errors at /opt/local/bin/pod2man line 68.
>
>Try:
>
>diff --git a/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod
>b/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod
>index de31bc1..c7fd8e9 100644
>--- a/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod
>+++ b/doc/crypto/EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA.pod
>@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ an RSA key will return B<EVP_PKEY_RSA>.
> EVP_PKEY_id() returns the actual OID associated with B<pkey>.
>Historically keys
> using the same algorithm could use different OIDs. For example an RSA
>key could
> use the OIDs corresponding to the NIDs B<NID_rsaEncryption> (equivalent
>to
>-B<EVP_PKEY_RSA) or B<NID_rsa> (equivalent to B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2>). The use
>of
>+B<EVP_PKEY_RSA>) or B<NID_rsa> (equivalent to B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2>). The use
>of
> alternative non-standard OIDs is now rare so B<EVP_PKEY_RSA2> et al are
>not
> often seen in practice.