[openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

Jeffrey Walton noloader at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 08:42:00 UTC 2016

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org> wrote:
> Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg

Thank you very much. That leads to:

-DENGINESDIR="\"/usr/local/lib64/engines\"" -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64
-DL_ENDIAN  -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC -Iinclude -I. -MMD -MF
ssl/t1_ext.d.tmp -MT ssl/t1_ext.o -c -o ssl/t1_ext.o ssl/t1_ext.c
ssl/t1_ext.c: In function ‘SSL_extension_supported’:
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: error: ‘TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg’ undeclared
(first use in this function)
     case TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg:
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for each function it appears in
Makefile:5954: recipe for target 'ssl/t1_ext.o' failed

More information about the openssl-dev mailing list