[openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?
Michel
michel.sales at free.fr
Mon Mar 21 09:34:01 UTC 2016
Hi Jeff,
Just for information, I send a patch and had a previous exchange about this with Rich :
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/openssl-org-4178-patch-OpenSSL-1-1-0-fails-when-configure-with-no-nextproto-td61662.html
Regards,
Michel.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-bounces at openssl.org] De la part de Jeffrey Walton
Envoyé : lundi 21 mars 2016 09:42
À : OpenSSL Developer ML
Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org> wrote:
> Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg
>
Thank you very much. That leads to:
gcc -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_DYNAMIC_ENGINE -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -DOPENSSLDIR="\"/usr/local/ssl\""
-DENGINESDIR="\"/usr/local/lib64/engines\"" -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC -Iinclude -I. -MMD -MF ssl/t1_ext.d.tmp -MT ssl/t1_ext.o -c -o ssl/t1_ext.o ssl/t1_ext.c
ssl/t1_ext.c: In function SSL_extension_supported :
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: error: TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg undeclared (first use in this function)
case TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg:
^
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Makefile:5954: recipe for target 'ssl/t1_ext.o' failed
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
More information about the openssl-dev
mailing list