[openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

Michel michel.sales at free.fr
Mon Mar 21 09:34:01 UTC 2016

Hi Jeff,

Just for information, I send a patch and had a previous exchange about this with Rich :




-----Message d'origine-----
De : openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-bounces at openssl.org] De la part de Jeffrey Walton
Envoyé : lundi 21 mars 2016 09:42
À : OpenSSL Developer ML
Objet : Re: [openssl-dev] Is a "no next protocol negotiation" (no-npn) a supported option?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Richard Levitte <levitte at openssl.org> wrote:
> Yes, there is such a configuration option: no-nextprotoneg

Thank you very much. That leads to:

-DENGINESDIR="\"/usr/local/lib64/engines\"" -Wall -O3 -pthread -m64 -DL_ENDIAN  -Wa,--noexecstack -fPIC -Iinclude -I. -MMD -MF ssl/t1_ext.d.tmp -MT ssl/t1_ext.o -c -o ssl/t1_ext.o ssl/t1_ext.c
ssl/t1_ext.c: In function  SSL_extension_supported :
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: error:  TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg  undeclared (first use in this function)
     case TLSEXT_TYPE_next_proto_neg:
ssl/t1_ext.c:303:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Makefile:5954: recipe for target 'ssl/t1_ext.o' failed
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

More information about the openssl-dev mailing list