[openssl-dev] use of X.509 lookup methods, X509_OBJECT internal or opaque?

[Salz, Rich]

> > Can you look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1044 and see if it
> addresses the issues?
> Yes.

Great, thanks!
 
> May be with some definitions for backward compatibility. I mean for
> renamed pre 1.1 functions - with inserted  ..._CTX.... into name of :
> - X509_STORE_get_by_subject
> - X509_STOREget1_{certs|crls}

Added #define's for the old names.

> I understand idea of new function X509_STORE_CTX_get_X509_by_subject.
> X509 is misleading.
> What about X509_STORE_CTX_get_obj_by_subject?

That's better.

I pushed a new version that adds your feedback.