[openssl-dev] Work on a new RNG for OpenSSL

[Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL]

    > Pseudorandomness of the output has been a design goal/requirement only
    > in SHA-3 family. Any prior hash function’s exhibition of this property is
    > coincidental.
    > 
    > Therefore I suggest using SHA3 instead.
    
    Is pseudorandomness a requirement?  Or is it the "50% chance of a bitflip"?

For [P]RNG?! In one word: yes. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-dev/attachments/20170626/7be4a9f5/attachment.bin>