[openssl-dev] License change agreement

[Quanah Gibson-Mount]

--On Friday, March 24, 2017 5:40 PM +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rsalz at akamai.com> 
wrote:

> The required source  code disclosures of the MPL are problematic.  The
> fact that the MPL allows distribution under a non-patent-protecting
> license is problematic.
>
> Ok?

Thanks Rich, that's a more useful starting point.  Has dual licensing been 
considered?  Both in 2015 and now, the lack of GPLv2 compatibility has 
shown to be a serious drawback to the APLv2.

--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>