[openssl-project] Votes on the use of other libraries in general and iconv in particular

[Richard Levitte]

Mm, I was thinking about it, but then, we have already discussed this in circles on github.

Besides, those are two week votes, and I now realised I did a procedural error when settling a closed date (what the hell was I thinking?). But still, that gives two weeks before the vote has to be concluded, does that not allow discussion? Has that ever stopped us from discussing before? 

Cheers
Richard 

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz at akamai.com> skrev: (7 juni 2018 16:51:30 CEST)
>I am disappointed that no time was allowed for discussion.
>
>On 6/7/18, 8:38 AM, "Richard Levitte" <levitte at openssl.org> wrote:
>
>    Hi,
>    
>    as promised, I've create two votes:
>    
>    ----------
> topic: We can use other standard / system libraries, per config target
>           A current example is using libiconv on Mac OS/X.  We will be
>         cautious in doing so in the libraries, and are more free to do
>           so in applications.
>    Proposed by Richard Levitte
>    Public: yes
>    opened: 2018-06-07
>    closed: 2018-06-21
>    ----------
>    topic: We can use the iconv API in our applications
>    Proposed by Richard Levitte
>    Public: yes
>    opened: 2018-06-07
>    closed: 2018-06-21
>    ----------
>    
>    The vote tallies will be presented here when the votes are closed.
>    
>    Cheers,
>    Richard
>    
>    -- 
>    Richard Levitte         levitte at openssl.org
>    OpenSSL Project         http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
>    _______________________________________________
>    openssl-project mailing list
>    openssl-project at openssl.org
>    https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>    
>
>_______________________________________________
>openssl-project mailing list
>openssl-project at openssl.org
>https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.