[openssl-project] Milestones and the 1.1.1 release

[Matt Caswell]

On 26/06/18 20:43, Salz, Rich wrote:
> That's interesting.  Would we put a bugfix in 1.1.0, not put the fix in 1.1.1 until our first "a" release?
> 
> Or are you saying that if it's in 1.1.0, then we don't have to fix it until after 1.1.1 comes out?  That seems justifiable to me.

The latter.

I mean it doesn't *prevent* us from fixing something that's in both
1.1.0 and 1.1.1 - but our focus should be on fixing issues that are
newly introduced in 1.1.1.

Matt

> 
> On 6/26/18, 3:32 PM, "Matt Caswell" <matt at openssl.org> wrote:
> 
>     
>     
>     On 26/06/18 18:18, Salz, Rich wrote:
>     > So are you saying look at the 73 open issues at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/milestone/9 and re-evaluate them?
>     
>     Exactly. My guess is that a significant proportion of them also apply to
>     1.1.0 and therefore should not hold up the 1.1.1 release. At the moment
>     though it is impossible to tell which are the high priority issues we
>     should be focussing on.
>     
>     Matt
>     
>     
>     > 
>     > 
>     > 
>     > On 6/26/18, 11:56 AM, "Matt Caswell" <matt at openssl.org> wrote:
>     > 
>     >     I'm thinking that we should maybe re-asses the current milestones in github.
>     >     
>     >     We currently use the following milestones:
>     >     
>     >     Assessed - Anything against this milestone isn't relevant to the 1.1.1
>     >     release (e.g. 1.0.2 specific issue)
>     >     
>     >     1.1.1 - This is relevant to the 1.1.1 release but may not be specific to
>     >     it (e.g. an issue that affects both 1.1.1 and 1.1.0)
>     >     
>     >     Post 1.1.1 - Feature request to be looked at once 1.1.1 is released
>     >     
>     >     
>     >     I think we should re-asses everything currently against the 1.1.1
>     >     milestone so that anything which isn't specific to that release gets
>     >     moved to the "Assessed" milestone.
>     >     
>     >     At the moment its difficult to see the "wood for the trees" between
>     >     issues which are newly introduced and those that are long standing. In
>     >     terms of getting the 1.1.1 release out the door we should focus on the
>     >     former.
>     >     
>     >     Thoughts?
>     >     
>     >     Matt
>     >     
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     openssl-project mailing list
>     >     openssl-project at openssl.org
>     >     https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>     >     
>     > 
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > openssl-project mailing list
>     > openssl-project at openssl.org
>     > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>     > 
>     _______________________________________________
>     openssl-project mailing list
>     openssl-project at openssl.org
>     https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openssl-project mailing list
> openssl-project at openssl.org
> https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project
>