OTC VOTE: Keeping API compatibility with missing public key

[SHANE LONTIS]

+1


> On 4 Dec 2020, at 10:45 pm, Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Vote background
> ---------------
> 
> The vote on relaxing the conceptual model in regards to required public
> component for EVP_PKEY has passed with the following text:
> 
> For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys, the OTC accepts the following resolution:
> * relax the conceptual model to allow private keys to exist without
> public components;
> * all implementations apart from EC require the public component to be
> present;
> * relax implementation for EC key management to allow private keys that
> do not contain public keys and
> * our decoders unconditionally generate the public key (where
> possible).
> 
> However since then the issue 13506 [1] was reported.
> 
> During OTC meeting we concluded that we might need to relax also other
> public key algorithm implementations to allow private keys without
> public component.
> 
> Vote
> ----
> 
> topic: For 3.0 EVP_PKEY keys all algorithm implementations that were usable
>       with 1.1.1 EVP_PKEY API or low level APIs without public component must
>       stay usable.
> 
>       This overrules the
>         * all implementations apart from EC require the public component to be present;
>       part of the vote closed on 2020-11-17.
> 
> Proposed by Tomas Mraz
> Public: yes
> opened: 2020-12-04
> 
> Tomas Mraz
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/attachments/20201205/3a3a8830/attachment.html>