1.1.1f

[Matt Caswell]

On 26/03/2020 15:14, Short, Todd wrote:
> This type of API-braking change should be reserved for something like
> 3.0, not a patch release.
> 
> Despite it being a "incorrect", it is expected behavior.
> 

Right - but the question now is not whether we should revert it (it has
been reverted) - but whether this should trigger a 1.1.1f release soon?

Matt

> --
> -Todd Short
> // tshort at akamai.com <mailto:tshort at akamai.com>
> // “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet."
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2020, at 11:03 AM, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
>> <Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com <mailto:Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I agree, go ahead. 
>>  
>> Please also consider reverting the change for the 3.0 alpha release as
>> well, see Daniel Stenbergs comment
>> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11378#issuecomment-603730581
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_issues_11378-23issuecomment-2D603730581&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=djWoIIXyggxwOfbwrmYGrSJdR5tWm06IdzY9x9tDxkA&e=>
>>  
>> Matthias
>>  
>>  
>> *From**:* openssl-project <openssl-project-bounces at openssl.org
>> <mailto:openssl-project-bounces at openssl.org>> *On Behalf Of *Dmitry
>> Belyavsky
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2020 3:48 PM
>> *To:* Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org <mailto:matt at openssl.org>>
>> *Cc:* openssl-project at openssl.org <mailto:openssl-project at openssl.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: 1.1.1f
>>  
>>  
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:14 PM Matt Caswell <matt at openssl.org
>> <mailto:matt at openssl.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     The EOF issue (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/11378
>>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_issues_11378&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=MAiLjfGJWaKvnBvqnM4fcyvGVfUyj9CDANO_vh4wfco&e=>)
>>     has
>>     resulted in us reverting the original EOF change in the 1.1.1 branch
>>     (https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11400
>>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openssl_openssl_pull_11400&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=QBEcQsqoUDdk1Q26CzlzNPPUkKYWIh1LYsiHAwmtRik&m=87AtfQDFl1z9cdRP12QeRUizmgnW6ejbufNT40Gip4Q&s=3hBU2pt84DQlrY1dCnSn9x1ah1gSzH6NEO_bNRH-6DE&e=>).
>>
>>     Given that this seems to have broken quite a bit of stuff, I propose
>>     that we do a 1.1.1f soon (possibly next Tuesday - 31st March).
>>
>>     Thoughts?
>>
>>  
>> I strongly support this idea.
>>  
>> -- 
>> SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
>