matt at openssl.org
Fri Mar 27 14:10:18 UTC 2020
There seems to be broad support for a 1.1.1f release. Unless I hear an
OMC objection I will formally announce this tomorrow.
On 27/03/2020 00:10, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:33:40PM +0000, Matt Caswell wrote:
>> On 26/03/2020 23:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>> we got into this situation because everything moves so quickly,
>>>> why does everyone here think we should move even faster now?
>>>> What is the reason for this?
>>> We've published a bug-fix release (1.1.1e) that's liable to cause more
>>> problems than it fixes. In such cases a closely-timed "fixup" (oops)
>>> release is expected. One that only reverts the (two) problem
>>> EOF-handling commits.
>> Actually a partial revert of one of them is sufficient to resolve the
> Yes, probably so. I took a sledge-hammer to the problem, and since the
> second commit depended on the first, I reverted both. If you leave
> the pre-requisites for the second commit in place, and just remove
> the changed error handling, then indeed that may also work.
More information about the openssl-project