HPKE PR process question

[Stephen Farrell]

Hiya,

On 25/05/2022 12:23, Matt Caswell wrote:
> Acknowledging receipt of this. We'll get back to you on it.

Thanks. I'm happy to provide further info or be involved
in the discussion if that's useful. An ETA for a substantive
response would also be welcome (e.g. weeks, a month, ...)

Cheers,
S

> 
> Matt
> 
> On 23/05/2022 22:41, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Back in November 2021 (~6 months ago) I created a PR [1]
>> suggesting an implementation of RFC 9180. In discussion,
>> the  "need OMC decision" tag was added to the PR on Dec
>> 14th.
>>
>> Since then, I have heard nothing at all and so far as I
>> can see, from bits of the openssl-project list archive
>> that I've checked, the OMC has had no discussion of this
>> PR at all.
>>
>> So, now I'm wondering how to make process-progress with
>> this PR - can you assist or point me at the correct place
>> to ask? (I can start a thread on openssl-users I guess if
>> that's better?)
>>
>> Please note that this is about trying to unblock the
>> process - the details of HPKE APIs are separate. (I
>> remain happy to do work to get my code in a shape that
>> the project likes, but to be honest, 6 months of seeming
>> process-blockage with no feedback is a tad de-motivating.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 10715 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/attachments/20220525/1bff4791/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/attachments/20220525/1bff4791/attachment.sig>