[openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2 Solaris 32 bit build is broken

John Unsworth John.Unsworth at owmessaging.com
Wed Apr 15 15:13:16 UTC 2015 

That seems to have fixed the crash.

-bash-3.00$ ./openssl rand 64
zÔòMÉÜOvá¯@ét†Å­EÙ^±Q!þ\‰b_¨ëYŸÁµiT-&n߇ñ¬“B+Õ9kx©î%hRÈz-bash-3.00$

Not sure about the output though.

However negotiation causes a core:

-bash-3.00$ ./openssl s_client -connect eos.es.cpth.ie:4250
CONNECTED(00000004)
depth=0 CN = jusworth-lt4.eu.cp.net
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 CN = jusworth-lt4.eu.cp.net
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
-bash-3.00$ pstack core
core 'core' of 12587:   ./openssl s_client -connect eos.es.cpth.ie:4250
000ed408 sha512_block_data_order (30e538, 30c050, 71a, 30e588, 30c050, 64f98fa7) + 8
0009fb30 ssl3_digest_cached_records (2f8ae0, 6, 2f8ea0, 14, 100, 2f8ea0) + 1cc
000980ec ssl3_get_certificate_request (2f8ae0, 2f8ea0, 2f8ea0, 10, a42e0, 2f8ae0) + 90
00093ad8 ssl3_connect (2f8ae0, 0, 1180, 1000, 1130, ffffffff) + 6c0
000aa2b8 ssl23_get_server_hello (2f8ae0, 16, 3, 3, 2f8ea0, 301638) + 648
000a9198 ssl23_connect (2f8ae0, 0, 3000, 2b4d64, 2b3d78, 1) + 588
000aa60c ssl23_write (2f8ae0, 2f0270, 0, 3000, ff247c94, a8c10) + 4c
0004ee64 s_client_main (0, 0, 1, 2b4d64, 2f8ae0, 2f4280) + 7374
0001328c do_cmd   (2eb3c8, 3, ffbffad0, 2b4638, 13e64, 2b3d78) + b8
00012f08 main     (4, ffbffacc, 2eb3c8, 29fc00, 2b3d78, 2b49dc) + 3a4
00012a08 _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2b3d78) + 108

Regards,
John

From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On Behalf Of John Foley
Sent: 15 April 2015 15:10
To: openssl-users at openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2 Solaris 32 bit build is broken

How about the ./openssl sha1 command?  Does that bomb too?

It might be interesting to copy crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl from the 1.0.1 source into the 1.0.2 source.  Then clean, configure, compile and try again.  There were changes to this file between 1.0.1 and 1.0.2.  Perhaps a bug was introduced.  I'm assuming this script generates the SHA source for your target platform.


On 04/15/2015 09:56 AM, John Unsworth wrote:
core 'core' of 24243:   ./openssl rand 64
000e9ce8 sha1_block_data_order (2ec298, 2ec2f4, 4, ffbfe018, ffbfe01c, 44) + 8
00226160 ssleay_rand_add (ffbfe114, 1, 20, ffbfdfec, 0, 14) + 530
00227048 RAND_poll (4, ffbfe100, ffbfe120, ffbfe120, 2c0650, 2c0644) + 38c
00226c00 ssleay_rand_status (c734, 0, 2b9f7c, 2c05cc, 2a0e70, 13000) + 138
00065eb4 app_RAND_load_file (ffbfe418, 2d5238, 0, 2800, 0, 1) + 88
00077cb8 rand_main (0, 0, ff242b30, 0, 0, 0) + 4b8
0001328c do_cmd   (2eb4e8, 2, ffbffae0, 2b4728, 13e64, 2b3e98) + b8
00012f08 main     (3, ffbffadc, 2eb4e8, 2a0000, 2b3e98, 2b4afc) + 3a4
00012a08 _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2b3e98) + 108

Regards,
John.

From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On Behalf Of John Foley
Sent: 15 April 2015 13:31
To: openssl-users at openssl.org<mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org>
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2 Solaris 32 bit build is broken

Do you see the same stack trace when simply using the random number generator:

./openssl rand 64

What if you simply use SHA1:

./openssl sha1 <somefile>



On 04/14/2015 12:17 PM, John Unsworth wrote:
Is no-one interested at all about this problem? Or do I need to send it to another place?

Regards,
John.

From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On Behalf Of John Unsworth
Sent: 10 April 2015 14:54
To: openssl-users at openssl.org<mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org>
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2 Solaris 32 bit build is broken

I have compiled 1.0.1m in the same way and that works fine using asm.

John.

From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On Behalf Of John Unsworth
Sent: 10 April 2015 12:21
To: openssl-users at openssl.org<mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org>
Subject: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2 Solaris 32 bit build is broken

I have an application that runs quite happily using OpenSSL 1.0.1h on Solaris 32 bit. I want to upgrade but both 1.0.2 and 1.0.2a cause problems.

1 When building 1.0.2 using

./Configure solaris-sparcv9-cc no-shared -m32 -xcode=pic32 -xldscope=hidden

openssl s_client crashes on start:

-bash-3.00$ ./openssl s_client -connect eos.es.cpth.ie:4250
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
-bash-3.00$ pstack core
core 'core' of 468:     ./openssl s_client -connect eos.es.cpth.ie:4250
000e9ce8 sha1_block_data_order (2ed490, 2ed4ec, 4, ffbfebc0, ffbfebc4, 44) + 8
00226140 ssleay_rand_add (ffbfecbc, 1, 20, ffbfeb94, 0, 14) + 530
00227028 RAND_poll (4, ffbfeca8, ffbfecc8, ffbfecc8, 2c0630, 2c0624) + 38c
00226be0 ssleay_rand_status (c734, 0, 2b9f5c, 2c05ac, 2a0e50, 13000) + 138
00065eb4 app_RAND_load_file (ffbfefc0, 2d5218, 1, 2800, 0, 1) + 88
0004d784 s_client_main (0, c00, 0, c00, 2b4adc, 2f4380) + 5c94
0001328c do_cmd   (2eb4c8, 3, ffbffa88, 2b4738, 13e64, 2b3e78) + b8
00012f08 main     (4, ffbffa84, 2eb4c8, 2a0000, 2b3e78, 2b4adc) + 3a4
00012a08 _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2b3e78) + 108

2 So I then rebuilt adding no-asm flag. It manages to connect but negotiation fails with an error:

4280581268:error:140943FC:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert bad record mac:s3_pkt.c:1456:SSL alert number 20
4280581268:error:140790E5:SSL routines:ssl23_write:ssl handshake failure:s23_lib.c:177:

This is against the server that is still running 1.0.1h and can be successfully connected with openssl built with 1.0.1h.

Note that the 64 bit build seems to work perfectly. Unfortunately for historical reasons we need to use the 32 bit version.

The 32 bit builds that we use on Windows and Linux also work perfectly. Is it something to do with byte order?

Regards,
John.







_______________________________________________

openssl-users mailing list

To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users





_______________________________________________

openssl-users mailing list

To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20150415/60d51bb7/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the openssl-users mailing list