OpenSSL compilation errors in Windows
Nagalakshmi V J
nagalakshmi.j at altran.com
Thu Oct 3 10:10:00 UTC 2019
Hi Matthias,
Please find my response for your queries below.
It would be more helpful if you would tell us *why* you are including ssl_locl.h and what you are trying to achieve. Then we might be able to tell you how you could achieve your goal using the officially supported API.
[Nagalakshmi]:
In our product code, we are using the structures 'ssl_st' and 'ssl_session_st' which were defined in ssl.h file in Openssl 1.0.2.j version.
Since the structure definitions are made opaque in openssl 1.1.1c, we used ssl_locl.h where the structure definitions are available.
Please note that many of the OpenSSL structures were made opaque in version 1.1.0. This means that there are only forward declarations of the structures in the public headers and the compiler does not get to see the structure members. Instead of directly accessing the members, it is now necessary to use accessor functions (a.k.a. getters and setters).
[Nagalakshmi]:
Regarding usage of accessor functions, I got the following APIs.
SSL_get_session(s)
SSL_SESSION_get_master_key().
If we use those APIs, I am again getting errors like the below.
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(164) : error C2027: use of undefined type 'ssl_session_st'
..\..\OpenSSL\openssl-1.1.1c\include\openssl/ssl.h(213) : see declaration of 'ssl_session_st'
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(164) : error C2227: left of '->SSL_SESSION_get_master_key' must point to class/struct/union
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(167) : error C2027: use of undefined type 'ssl_st'
..\..\OpenSSL\openssl-1.1.1c\include\openssl/ossl_typ.h(147) : see declaration of 'ssl_st'
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(167) : error C2227: left of '->session' must point to class/struct/union
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(167) : error C2227: left of '->master_key' must point to class/struct/union
.\odlibPrf_OSSL.h(168) : error C2027: use of undefined type 'ssl_st'
Can you help me to get the corresponding accessor functions for these 2 structures.
Thanks and regards,
Nagalakshmi
-----Original Message-----
From: Nagalakshmi V J <nagalakshmi.j at altran.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 6:33 PM
To: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com>; Nagalakshmi V J <nagalakshmi.j at altran.com>
Cc: openssl-users at openssl.org; Umamaheswari Nagarajan <umamaheswari.nagarajan at altran.com>
Subject: RE: OpenSSL compilation errors in Windows
Thank you Matthias for the explanation. I am going through my code to understand why ssl_locl.h is included. I will check and get back on this ASAP. Also if there is other way to achieve that I will use the same.
Thanks and regards,
Nagalakshmi
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com<mailto:Matthias.St.Pierre at ncp-e.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 4:43 PM
To: Nagalakshmi V J <nagalakshmi.j at altran.com<mailto:nagalakshmi.j at altran.com>>
Cc: openssl-users at openssl.org<mailto:openssl-users at openssl.org>; Umamaheswari Nagarajan <umamaheswari.nagarajan at altran.com<mailto:umamaheswari.nagarajan at altran.com>>
Subject: AW: OpenSSL compilation errors in Windows
** This mail has been sent from an external source **
> We are using OpenSSL APIs in our product code. We are not making any changes in OpenSSL.
> Our product code is a C++ code and it makes use of openSSL APIs for some functionality.
Local headers (like "ssl_locl.h" and "packet_locl.h") are *NOT* part of the official OpenSSL API.
Please don't expect any support w.r.t. compilation or compatibility problems if you do include them in your application, even more if it's compiled using a C++ compiler.
It would be more helpful if you would tell us *why* you are including ssl_locl.h and what you are trying to achieve. Then we might be able to tell you how you could achieve your goal using the officially supported API.
Please note that many of the OpenSSL structures were made opaque in version 1.1.0. This means that there are only forward declarations of the structures in the public headers and the compiler does not get to see the structure members. Instead of directly accessing the members, it is now necessary to use accessor functions (a.k.a. getters and setters). If this is the reason why you are including private OpenSSL headers then you should adopt you application to use the new accessors instead, instead of forcing the impossible to circumvent the new policy.
For more information, see
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openssl.org_index.php_OpenSSL-5F1.1.0-5FChanges&d=DwIGaQ&c=cxWN2QSDopt5SklNfbjIjg&r=zbjUR56YPF3jaTRTjX4KZlHM9-LmYAuR5atSqEGOnpA&m=wpEV8Q2RDZjERhtJGZl9HajV9jd2dJFF10J30_YrPQo&s=sX1YilJaXloAQDzrjD3Lz-I6DOej3QduhsAanXOYxVM&e=
Matthias
Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
Senior Software Engineer
matthias.st.pierre at ncp-e.com<mailto:matthias.st.pierre at ncp-e.com>
Phone: +49 911 9968-0
www.ncp-e.com<http://www.ncp-e.com>
Headquarters Germany: NCP engineering GmbH • Dombuehler Str. 2 • 90449 • Nuremberg North American HQ: NCP engineering Inc. • 678 Georgia Ave. • Sunnyvale, CA 94085 East Coast Office: NCP engineering Inc. • 601 Cleveland Str., Suite 501-25 • Clearwater, FL 33755
Authorized representatives: Peter Soell, Patrick Oliver Graf, Beate Dietrich Registry Court: Lower District Court of Nuremberg Commercial register No.: HRB 7786 Nuremberg, VAT identification No.: DE 133557619
This e-mail message including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message and destroy all copies thereof.
=====================================================
Please refer to https://northamerica.altran.com/email-disclaimer
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
=====================================================
=====================================================
Please refer to https://northamerica.altran.com/email-disclaimer
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
=====================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20191003/d7876335/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openssl-users
mailing list